Certified Legal Assistant Certified Paralegal (CLA-CP) Practice Test 2025 - Free Paralegal Practice Questions and Study Guide

The action of amending the statute is indeed a viable approach when there is a dispute or contest over statutory interpretation. Statutes can sometimes be vague or unclear, leading to differing interpretations by judges, attorneys, and other stakeholders. When significant disagreements arise, legislative bodies may choose to amend the existing statute to clarify its intent, scope, or application.

Amendments can address specific issues raised during legal challenges and can provide clearer guidance for enforcement and compliance moving forward. This legislative process allows for corrective measures to be taken, ensuring that the law reflects the intended meaning and meets the needs of the public or specific circumstances that have come to light through contested cases.

The other actions presented may come into play in different contexts. Reviewing previous rulings can provide insight into how courts have previously interpreted the statute but does not change the law itself. Issuing a cease and desist order is a more immediate regulatory response typically used in enforcement situations rather than clarifying statutory interpretation. Creating new regulations can guide the application of a statute but does not address the statute's wording itself. Thus, amending the statute stands out as the most direct way to resolve contested interpretations.